Class 2 · Aug 27 (Thu)

Promises, Bargains, and Remedies

What a promise is, what a bargain is, and what the law does about either.

Module I: Foundations · Fall 2026

Ready

Reading

Chapter 1 (revisit) and Chapter 2 (full). Restatement (Second) § 1, § 2, § 3.

Time budget

Floor
~40 min — R2d § 1 + Pappas. The doctrine the next class assumes you have covered.
Target
~75 min — Floor + R2d § 2 + synthesis.
Ceiling
~110 min — Target + Practice problems + open-discussion on the synthesis question.

By the end of this class, you can

This class fixes the vocabulary of the course. By the end of the hour you should be able to say which of these the law cares about, and why, in a sentence or two:

Each one is a different thing. The casebook draws the lines; we walk through them in order. Pappas v. Bever sits at the boundary between the first and second: the doctor’s “I intend to subscribe” is the canonical example of a statement that sounds promissory but is not a promise.

Doctrinal goals

Remedy preview

We close with a thirty-second preview of remedies: damages (default), specific performance (limited), rescission (when assent fails). The point is to seed the question Hadley will eventually answer in April, not to teach it.

Slide deck

Open slides for Class 2 →

Spacebar / arrow keys to advance. Press F for fullscreen. Click Print / PDF for handouts. PPTX export is professor-only.

Rules

Cases

Cold call

Prepare to be called on: Hawkins v. McGee (continued from Class 1)

K exercises

Notes

Lead-in to formation. The aim is to put the basic vocabulary (promise, agreement, bargain) on stable ground before we attempt to define mutual assent next week.